Hi,
I'm currently looking at the newest rules of shooting document dated April 2017 and see some changes from my version dated April 2012. I was hoping that someone with a current set of handicap tables could answer a few questions that I have (my handicap tables are dated April 2012)?
1. Bray I/II: Now states: full size and triple face where it used to state full size only.
This suggests to me that the handicap tables should have been updated so that there will be four columns for Bray I (and likewise for Bray II): non-compound full face, non-compound triple, compound full face, compound triple. Is this the case?
2. Portsmouth: Now states: full size, 5 zoneor triple face (this is exactly as stated in the document).
Can someone please clarify which faces are valid. I'm thinking full size and 5 zone triple. Was 6 zone ever valid?
3. 6 zone face.
Do any rounds allow this face? Which one(s) please?
4. I've seen a website state that the Bray I/II are classed as five zone scoring. It is ten zone scoring surely?
Many thanks,
Steve
I'm currently looking at the newest rules of shooting document dated April 2017 and see some changes from my version dated April 2012. I was hoping that someone with a current set of handicap tables could answer a few questions that I have (my handicap tables are dated April 2012)?
1. Bray I/II: Now states: full size and triple face where it used to state full size only.
This suggests to me that the handicap tables should have been updated so that there will be four columns for Bray I (and likewise for Bray II): non-compound full face, non-compound triple, compound full face, compound triple. Is this the case?
2. Portsmouth: Now states: full size, 5 zoneor triple face (this is exactly as stated in the document).
Can someone please clarify which faces are valid. I'm thinking full size and 5 zone triple. Was 6 zone ever valid?
3. 6 zone face.
Do any rounds allow this face? Which one(s) please?
4. I've seen a website state that the Bray I/II are classed as five zone scoring. It is ten zone scoring surely?
Many thanks,
Steve