Russ
Member
I went shopping for arrows recently, and was told by a trusted archer/retailer that Easton's Navigators (and the newer FMJ Navs) were designed for compound bows, and as a recurve archer I should stick with ACCs.
I should point out that I'm not in the market for ACEs or X10s, simply because I'm not shooting at a level where I'd notice the difference (and therefore couldn't justify the considerable extra cost). But maybe next year...:scratchch
But seriously, has anyone else heard this about Navigators? It seems to me a lot of recurve archers use them, even if they are designed for compound. Are they that much better than ACCs that I might actually notice the difference?
And here's a more general question (which is not really important - I'm just looking for the gossip): anyone know why Easton shafts have suddenly gone down in price?
Cheers,
Russ
I should point out that I'm not in the market for ACEs or X10s, simply because I'm not shooting at a level where I'd notice the difference (and therefore couldn't justify the considerable extra cost). But maybe next year...:scratchch
But seriously, has anyone else heard this about Navigators? It seems to me a lot of recurve archers use them, even if they are designed for compound. Are they that much better than ACCs that I might actually notice the difference?
And here's a more general question (which is not really important - I'm just looking for the gossip): anyone know why Easton shafts have suddenly gone down in price?
Cheers,
Russ