ArcheryFox
Active member
I have been doing a bit of playing and research with stabiliser setups recently for compound target.
I have come across the ideas relating to a balanced system vs a system biased to one side and the benefits of each one.
I note that many archers for target choose a single side rod with varying angles and there are only a few with 2 side rods.
However, when it comes to field I note that there are a great deal more archers using 2 side rods in what looks to be a more balanced setup.
My thoughts on this would be that perhaps when aiming uphill and downhill the balanced system might be more comfortable, whereas a single rod system biased to one side might feel different at different angles.
Wondering if anyone else has any thoughts on this or can share some experiences.
Whilst I am stuck indoors at the moment I am hoping for a good field season this year and it is already on the horizon.
I have come across the ideas relating to a balanced system vs a system biased to one side and the benefits of each one.
I note that many archers for target choose a single side rod with varying angles and there are only a few with 2 side rods.
However, when it comes to field I note that there are a great deal more archers using 2 side rods in what looks to be a more balanced setup.
My thoughts on this would be that perhaps when aiming uphill and downhill the balanced system might be more comfortable, whereas a single rod system biased to one side might feel different at different angles.
Wondering if anyone else has any thoughts on this or can share some experiences.
Whilst I am stuck indoors at the moment I am hoping for a good field season this year and it is already on the horizon.